MO: Some Sex Offenders Could Be Banned from Going Near Missouri Nature and Education Centers

[douglascountyherald.com – 2/20/20]

State Representative Hannah Kelly, R-Mountain Grove, wants to ban some registered sex offenders from going within 500 feet of any Missouri Conservation Department nature or education center. The Missouri House Public Safety and Crime Prevention Committee is considering Kelly’s bill, which could charge violators with a felony. The measure would apply to sex offenders who have committed certain sex crimes against children.

“We have an ultimate responsibility to ensure that when the prosecutor goes after that individual for perpetrating evil crimes against a child, that we have teeth in the statute to make sure that the next person who might think about doing that, decides not to because they see the proper punishment has been handed down,” says Kelly.

During a public hearing, Missouri Department of Conservation Deputy Director Aaron Jeffries says the agency asked Kelly to sponsor the measure. He says about 800,000 kids visit the agency’s nature centers annually.

“How this got on our radar was simply off-duty police officers or conservation officers participating in programs at our nature centers recognizing registered sex offenders and not being able to do anything about the situation,” says Jeffries.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yep. Unconstitutional in Michigan, but totally okay in Missouri. What a crock!!!!

“How this got on our radar was simply off-duty police officers or conservation officers participating in programs at our nature centers recognizing registered sex offenders and not being able to do anything about the situation,” says Jeffries.

Not being able to do anything about “WHAT????” situation? If you call registered sex offenders standing there not bothering anyone or causing any problems or breaking any laws a “situation”, well then I guess when a sex offender stands anywhere, not breaking any laws or bothering anyone a “situation” then I guess sex offenders should be banned from food shopping (kids are in grocery stores), banned from stores like Walmart (tons of kids in Walmart stores), banned from taking a walk (kids do walk), banned from going to a movie (I think kids may go to movies, not quite sure though but we should ban sex offenders from going to movies just in case – “sarcasm” applied).

Let’s go all out on the next step to take to protect the public from these evil sex offenders, especially if it saves “just one child”.

New law states – all sex offenders are not to leave their homes except during the hours of 8:03pm-8:21pm and during this time while the sex offenders are allowed out of their homes all streets will be cleared of all persons (non sex offenders), extra police will be assigned to every street corner and all stores, shops, restaurants will lock their doors while these horrible “non-humans” walk the streets for their daily exercise. “That should do it!!”.

Will this madness ever stop?!

English is delightful:

“off-duty police officers or conservation officers participating in programs at our nature centers recognizing registered sex offenders and not being able to do anything about the situation”

1. Who are these off duty police officers recognizing any person related to any prior criminal activity let alone sex offenses? How boring must their jobs be to be off duty and easily recognize people who registered?

2. Why would conservation officers be recognizing anyone registered?

3. Exactly what situations are these ridiculous people so bothered by? If anyone was doing anything illegal on duty law enforcement or security would be able to do something about it.

She is pandering and this tact by profiteers & politicians are common place.

@NorthEastPenn

Well put and I agree fully with the lunacy.

Representative Andrew McDaniel, R-Deering, says the legislation would not stop someone from trying to do something bad to a child.

“The ones that are still abiding by the law and are going back into society and being decent people still – trying to – but we keep pushing them into corners by keep on adding more obstructions to their daily life,” says McDaniel.
—–
I’m glad to see at least ONE of those morons gets it, at least some.

Dont think this would ever stand being Nature Centers receive Federal funding and is not part of SORNA laws could be wrong dont believe the law would stand if passed.